Google's Gemini AI wants to scan your photos for its "Personal Intelligence" feature. EU regulators are pushing back under GDPR.

The feature analyzes photos to build personalized AI responses. Google requires explicit opt-in, but users report being prompted again and again. One Hacker News commenter said they refused every prompt and the feature stayed off. But repeated nudges raise a real question. Does "opt-in" count as voluntary when you're asked constantly?

GDPR requires consent to be freely given, specific, and informed. EU regulators argue that persistent prompting undermines the "freely given" part. It's not coercion. But it's also not leaving people alone to decide.

Each AI company takes a different approach to user data. Apple processes photos on-device when possible. Anthropic won't use customer data for training without consent. OpenAI lets you disable chat history to prevent training. Meta keeps using your data with limited ways to opt out.

Google sits between OpenAI and Meta on this spectrum. The company says it's offering choice. Critics say it's wearing down that choice through repetition.

Fully local AI would solve this. Process everything on your phone, nothing leaves, no consent dance required. The technology isn't ready for complex tasks yet. But for photo analysis? We might be closer than you'd think.